Thursday, January 21, 2010

Our Mutual Read

I've joined another challenge - Our Mutual Read. I belong to a 19th Century British Literature Book Club, so I read a Victorian novel or lay every month. I won't review them all, though, so I signed up at Level 1. Here's what I'm *planning* to read and review, but it could (and probably will) change:

  • The Moonstone – Wilkie Collins (1868)

  • Tenant of Wildfell Hall – Anne Bronte (1848) (cross-listed w/ Bronte Challenge)

  • North & South – Elizabeth Gaskell (1855)

  • Villette – Charlotte Bronte (1853) (cross-listed w/ Bronte Challenge)



This challenge is located here, and hosted by Amanda who writes The Blog Jar. Thanks Amanda!

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Join the Battle of the Bards and get your Shakespeare on!

It's hot Bard on Bard action as Shakespeare fights against... himself?

Padfoot and Prongs of Good Books Inc. are hosting a basketball-style bracket for us bookish types. They are pitting 8 of Shakespeare's comedies against 8 of his tragedies. Each week they will featuring highlights from the battling plays, giving interesting facts, quotes, and summaries for each play. Then there will be a vote for each battle. You can join the fun and read the details here. Sign-up deadline is before Monday 18 January as the battle starts Monday. Oh yeah, they're giving away some awesome PRIZES too!

This looks like a great way to review some plays you have read, and be introduced to some you haven't. Between this and my current reading of Will in the World by Stephen Greenblatt, I know there will be a few more plays on my reading list pretty soon. I would love to (one day) say I've read them all but I'm terrible on the histories.

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

2009 Reading Recap

My 2009 Reading goal was 40+ books, which I accomplished. I'm sure I could read a lot more books if I spent less time reading blogs, but I enjoy them both. I think 50-52 books is my absolute limit for a year. I felt a bit burned out on reading by the Fall!

1. March - Geraldine Brooks
2. The Cat Owner's Manual
3. Nights in Rodanthe - Nick Sparks
4. I Escaped from Auschwitz - Rudolf Vrba
5. The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao - Junot Diaz
6. Jane Eyre - Charlotte Brontë
7. Confederacy of Dunces - John Kennedy O'toole
8. Slaughterhouse-Five - Kurt Vonnegut
9. The Picture of Dorian Gray - Oscar Wilde
10. People of the Book - Geraldine Brooks
11. Pemberley Manor - Kathryn L. Nelson
12. When Twilight Burns - Colleen Gleason
13. Pride and Prejudice - Jane Austen
14. And only to Deceive - Tasha Alexander
15. The Time Machine - H.G. Wells
16. Blue Latitudes - Tony Horowitz
17. Lolita - Vladimir Nabokov
18. As Shadows Fade - Colleen Gleason (Gardella Vampire series)
19. Treasure Island - Robert Louis Stevenson
20. Olive Kitteridge - Elizabeth Strout
21. Emma - Jane Austen (Naxos audiobook)
22. Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince - JK Rowling
23. The Awakening - Kate Chopin
24. Last Bus to Woodstock - Colin Dexter (Insp. Morse mystery)
25. The Sign of the Four - Sherlock Holmes
26. Travels with Barley - Ken Wells
27. Stumbling Upon Happiness - Dan Gilbert
28. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - JK Rowling
29. The Remains of the Day - Kazuo Ishiguro
30. A Wrinkle in Time - Madeline L'Engle
31. MAUS I - Art Spiegelman
32. The House of Mirth - Edith Wharton
33. Lady Susan - Jane Austen (Librivox audiobook)
34. David Copperfield - Charles Dickens
35. An Embarrassment of Mangoes - Ann Vanderhoof
36. Love in the Time of Cholera - Gabriel García Márquez
37. Dracula - Bram Stoker
38. Carmilla - J. Sheridan Le Fanu; The Vampyre - John Polidori
39. The Book Thief - Markus Zusak
40. Jude the Obscure - Thomas Hardy
41. Firefly Lane - Kristin Hannah
42. The Unbearable Lightness of Being - Milan Kundera
43. A Christmas Carol - Charles Dickens
44. The Time Traveler's Wife - Audrey Niffenegger
45. MAUS II - Art Spiegelman

Favorite reads: March and The Book Thief were both very profound experiences. These are books that I can, have, and will recommend to anyone and everyone.

Least favorite: another tie: Nights in Rodanthe and Last Bus to Woodstock were big wastes of time. I did also try to read The Feast of Love and didn't even finish it, but it probably would have been time better spent than on these two.

Best re-read: House of Mirth. I read it in high school and promptly forgot it, but this time it blew me away. Wharton's artistry and sensitivity amaze me.

Series finished: Harry Potter (I was a latecomer) and Colleen Gleason's regency-set Gardella Vampire series. Both enjoyable escapes, but HP was overhyped whereas Gleason is under-appreciated. She was out in front of this vampire trend, and writes well.

Most surprising: David Copperfield. I was trepidatious about this Dickens tome after suffering through The Old Curiosity Shop last year, but I loved every minute of David Copperfield and didn't want it to end. Also I discovered that I don't hate audiobooks (although they were both Austens, so that may have helped. Listening to Lady Susan via free Librivox audiobook was a great experience.)

Most fun: Blue Latitudes. A drunken romp through the islands. I was seeing clear blue water in my mind for weeks. Also learned a good bit about Capt. Cook along the way. It was the perfect vicarious vacation for a year I couldn't take a real one.

Resolutions for 2010: don't read books that aren't worth the time. If I'd better enjoy reading something else, or nothing at all, do it! Reading should never be a chore.

Thursday, December 31, 2009

All About the Brontes Challenge 2010


Fresh off one challenge, I'm joining another. I'm terrible at sticking to them but I think I can read three works by/about the Brontes in 2010. Laura's Reviews in hosting the All About The Brontes Challenge.

Here's my reasonable, unambitious plan:
1. The Secret Diaries of Charlotte Bronte by Syrie James
I loved her Austen diary, and think Bronte will give her ever more to work with. Plus this book has been on my TBR shelf for a while now.

2. The Tenant of Wildfell Hall by Anne Bronte
My 19th Cent Brit Lit bookclub is reading this soon. I have no idea what to expect but am looking forward to a new experience!

3. Villette by Charlotte Bronte
This is actually my favorite Bronte work, despite its flaws. This challenge will be good motivation to re-read it!

MAUS I and II by Art Spiegelman


MAUS (Vol I – My Father Bleeds History; Vol. II – And Here My Troubles Began) is a graphic novel (aka comic book) written and drawn by Art Spiegelman recounting his father Vladek's experiences in World War II. Vladek, a Polish Jew, was imprisoned in Auschwitz and separated from his wife, but amazingly they both survived and were reunited after the war.

Artie is a character in the work, and much of the plot deals with his difficult relationship with his father. As his father's health fails, Artie does become closer to him and understand him better while his father narrates his story for the book.

Volume one is very emotionally intense, as it deals with the beginning of the Holocaust, and the aftermath of Artie's mother's suicide decades later. We see how, during the early days of the holocaust, many Poles “sold out” the Jews, turning them in for the money. Bribes, betrayal, starvation, mercy killings, poison, suicide run rampant in this time.

In the present, we see Artie's complicated relationship with his father, Vladek's unhappy second marriage to Mala, in which each thinks the other cares only about money. We learn a bit about Artie's own time in a mental hospital (before mother died). Artie is outraged that his father burned his mother's diaries in a fit of depression – the diaries were meant them for him and would have helped in writing his book.

Most moving line, for me, was in volume one. Anja's first son, left in hiding with a caretaker, was poisoned to avoid capture, and when Anja finds out her son is dead and wants to die herself. Vladek tells her. “No, darling! To die, it's easy.. But you have to struggle for life! Until the last moment we must struggle together. I need you! And you'll see that together we'll survive.” (p122)

The most moving image was when leaving town, the crossroads was drawn as a swastika – a ominous sign that they had nowhere to go. Another grim image is the arrival at the infamous gates of Auschwitz. As Vladek recounts: “We knew the stories – that they will gas us and throw us in the ovens. This was 1944... We knew everything. And here we were.”

Volume two deals more with the father/son relationship – Artie is impatient, his father is difficult and controlling. When Mala leaves him things come to a head since Artie has to spend more time with Vladek.

Upon arrival at Auschwitz Vladek befriends a Polish kapo and is protected/privileged somewhat. A combination of luck, resourcefulness, and mental and physical strength get him through this ordeal. We learn how he communicated with his wife Anja who was in Birkenau, how they gave each other hope.

I am amazed by the perseverance of these survivors, and appalled by some of the choices they had to make and the terrible things they witnessed. Bribery was a way of life, and friendships were often more strategic than genuine. Prisoners who worked the gas chambers were killed every few months so that they did not get word out about what happened there. Some prisoners (mostly Hungarians) were burned alive in pits because there was no room in the gas chambers. Vladek tells Artie that the Jews didn't resist because they were starving, tired and frightened. Also they had hope the Russians would come and defeat the Nazis before it was too late.

The recurring image that stays with me from book 2 is of the crematorium chimney, and the dark humorous phrase that the only way one left the camp was “up the chimney.”

While Vladek may have some “survivor's guilt,” Artie as the son of a survivor seems to fell that nothing he does can stand up to this achievement. Even though he knows luck played a large part, he wrestles with his own guilt over the success of book 1. Although he understands better why is father pinches pennies, he is appalled by his close-minded racism towards blacks. Artie seems to struggle with the fact that he respects what his father did in the past, but doesn't like the person he is in the present.

Overall, volume two did not seem as compelling and dramatic as book one. The pace was faster, with more jumps from past to present. The wartime portions felt rushed, and the ending was sudden and felt incomplete somehow. I got the impression that Art felt forced to finish the story. There seemed to be less artistry in the words and images. There was some great factual information in volume 2 about the end of the war though.

I learned that reading graphic novels is hard for me – it is kind of like watching a foreign film with subtitles – I pay attention to the words more than the images, so sometimes I miss things. At least with a book you can turn back. I need to get used to reading a page and then looking at the images again to get an overall impression before moving to the next (or look first, then read). Overall though I found Maus compelling – it shows that a serious story can be told in comic format (this was groundbreaking when first published in the late 80's/early 90s). Also it could be a good introduction for young adults who are more interested in this genre than in reading a history text. The firsthand information and the unique style make it a worthwhile read.

***This is my fifth and final review for the War Through the Generations WWII reading challenge.*** I also read and reviewed:
I Escaped from Auschwitz
Slaughterhouse-Five
The Remains of the Day
The Book Thief

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

My even more rambling than usual review of The Book Thief by Markus Zuzak

“I think I’ve hit a wall. Not sure if I can read any more WWII lit. Book Thief summed up so much, but now I feel saturated and emotionally drained.”

I wrote that after reading The Book Thief and discussing it with my book club. That was a couple months ago and I’ve been putting off reviewing it ever since, because I just don’t know how to do it justice. This is absolutely the most powerful book I’ve read this year. Maybe this decade. Maybe my whole life? I don’t know. I do know that it lives up to all the hype and praise it has received from more gifted reviewers.

I had trouble “getting into” the story at first, due largely to the unusual writing style and unorthodox narrator (death). Others had the same problem, but like everyone else I eventually got “sucked in” to Liesel Meminger’s story and couldn’t put it Markus Zusak’s brilliant novel down. Liesel is the “book thief” of the title, a young German (non-Jewish) foster child being raised by kind but poor strangers in a small town during WWII. Ironically, she’s an illiterate book thief at first, but her love pf books as object is soon transformed into a love of reading as well, through the tutelage of her warm-hearted foster father.

Through Liesel we see what life may have been like on the other side – we know a lot about the experience of Jews, but fewer books and novels seem to dwell on the hardships and complexities of the war for the German people. Not all Germans were Nazis, but rationing affected them all. The party had ways of coercing people to at least pay lip service to the Nazi ideals, by taking away their jobs and/or forcing them into the army. In this novel, many feel for the Jews and want to help. Some hold back for fear of endangering their families. Some (like Liesel's parents) take a stand in the small but brave ways that they can. It seems that in many ways Germany was waging war, physically, psychologically and economically, on its own people as well as the rest of the world.

As Liesel and her best friend/next-door neighbor Rudy grow into adolescence, we see how powerful the examples of the adults around them are to their growth. Small but meaningful acts of subversion figure prominently in this story - painting over Mein Kampf, giving people bread, walking with the Jews – create bonds of love, trust, and hope. Hatred kills, but a small act of kindness still can mean more than a large act of violence.

Books play such a role in this novel. At first they are coveted (sometime forbidden) objects. They create a connection between Liesel and her new father, Liesel and the mayor’s wife. They are by turns the enemy, a receptacle, a blank slate, a memento, an escape. They are impermanent. They are immortal.

At a deeper level, this novel is about the power of words both to save and destroy. Some would say WWII was started with words, fed with words. But words can also rebel. Words can heal. There is beauty, even within brutality. This novel is, if nothing else a great reminder of the power of words and the importance (and fragility) of our freedom to read anything anytime anywhere.

The heartbreaking ending will leave every reader in tears. What Zusak does to his characters seems cruel, but then it is no less cruel than the reality of the times. The empathy we can feel for fictional characters should be a tiny fraction of what we feel for real people. This book made me wonder which is a more powerful force in the world - hatred or kindness?

It also made me understand the power of fiction to access a greater, deeper "truth" than that of the facts. This story would not be the same if it were true, although the spirit of it is clearly based in the realities of WWII. Zusak the true experiences but adds both critical distance and artistic license to create something that is greater than the sum of facts and that reaches us differently. The novel is based on a hindsight that understands the depth of the atrocities, the complexity of the situation for everyday Germans, and the terrible power of words to fuel war, but also to heal the pain of war.

A key quote struck me like an arrow while reading, and has stayed with me since. It sums up so much, about why we make war, why we survive war, and why we read about war: Death wants to ask Liesel about the war:
"I wanted to ask her how the same thing could be so ugly and so glorious, and its words and stories so damning and brilliant."


PS - Here is a short, informative video of the (very young!) author talking about what influenced him to write the book, why he chose Death as his narrator, and whether or not it is a YA novel:

Monday, December 21, 2009

Happy Holidays - Book Blogger Holiday Swap



I was so thrilled to receive a package Saturday (in the midst of wintry weather, no less!) from my Book Blogger Holiday Swap (semi-)secret Santa.

In it I found an abundance:
A beautiful gold and green stocking/wine bag containing a Lindt extra dark chocolate truffle bar (yum!) and a super cute "Fly Away with a Good book" bookmark with 3 different charms (a ladybug, butterfly, and dragonfly)
A box of Stash decaf vanilla chai tea, which is right up my alley
A book called "Tea & Crumpets - Recipes and Rituals from European Tea Rooms and Cafes"



There was also a lovely Christmas card with a note from Sari - apologizing because she couldn't "go all out" (What!) This was really a beautiful, thoughtful, "above and beyond" gift in my opinion and it really cheered up my cold, snowed in day! I know I will be drinking tea, eating chocolate, and reading my book all winter. I can't wait to put some of the recipes to use at my next tea party. Our book club has them regularly so I'm looking forward to feeding scones to all my friends!



Thank you so much Sari, and a very Merry Christmas to you! Thanks also to the hosts of the Book Bloggers Holiday Swap for helping us all to spread the cheer!